Publications & Resources

Search TCP documents by typing a keyword (e.g., author, document title, etc.) into the search box and hitting the search button. Refine your results by selecting from the issues, material types, date range, and committee options listed. You can also browse recent publications and resources below.

Search by Keyword


Browse by Issue(s)
Browse by Material Type(s)
Browse by Date Range
Browse by Committee(s)

  Criminal Justice Advisory Committee
  Death Penalty Committee
  DNA Collection Committee
  National Right to Counsel Committee
  Sentencing Committee
  The Courts Committee

  Constitutional Amendments Committee
  War Powers Committee
  Liberty & Security Committee
  Immigration Committee
  Policing Reform Committee
  Clearinghouse

*Note: Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in Clearinghouse material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Constitution Project.

Search Results

John Kerry says the GOP’s Iran letter was ‘unconstitutional.’ Was it?
Podcast: American foreign policy, Iran and the Constitution
Federal Drive Interview with Morton Rosenburg about Presidential Recess Appointments
A three-judge appeals court has dealt a setback to the Obama administration in the way it made recess appointments. The ruling could invalidate the appointment of Richard Cordray at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The court said presidents can only make recess appointments during the recess between yearly sessions of Congress and only if the vacancy happens during that recess. President Obama appointed Cordray during the July Fourth holiday. Mort Rosenberg is a fellow at the Constitution Project and a former specialist the American Law Division of the Congressional Research Service.
The Cost of Justice: Budgetary Threats to America’ s Courts Today
At both the federal and state levels, independent courts are critical to preserving our constitutional system of checks and balances and protecting our constitutional rights. This report examines the impact of fiscal crises in the states – which have led to budgetary cutbacks – and on the ability of state judicial systems to fulfill their important constitutional duties.
Testimony of Charles Geyh to House Judiciary Subcommittee regarding Judicial Ethics
Professor Charles G. Geyh testifies that although the Judicial Transparency and Ethics Enforcement Act of 2006 has a laudable goal – to make the federal judiciary better accountable for its budget and for the ethical transgressions of its judges – pursuing that goal by creating an inspector general for the federal judiciary is highly problematic. The preferred approach is to work cooperatively with the courts to address the concerns that animate the bill, rather than to impose a problematic solution on an unwilling judiciary.
Newsroom Guide to Judicial Independence (Updated 2006)
In the era of the 24-hour news cycle, reporters face unprecedented challenges. Particularly in the era of the 24-hour news cycle, reporters face unprecedented challenges - particularly for journalists who cover government and political beats, obtaining the backstory behind the headlines often requires a luxury they don't have: time. The Constitution Project's Courts Initiative created the Newsroom Guide to provide reporters with our members’ experience and expertise through a variety of material: historical information on judicial independence, related court cases, quotes from lawmakers, a glossary of terms, a chart detailing judicial selection methods in each state and U.S. territory, and leads to organizations and people who are valuable resources for reporters.
Ten Principles for Preserving Courts’ Role in American Democracy
The Constitution Project's Courts Initiative released four bipartisan task force reports in 2000 examining federal judicial selection, public and political censure of individual judges, and legislative efforts to restrict courts’ ability to hear cases. Ten Principles for Preserving Courts' Role in American Democracy reiterates the fundamental, bipartisan principles from these task force findings and recommendations, which are based on the premise that courts can be impartial and fair only if they are free to decide cases without influence by special interests or fear of political reprisals
Justice Held Hostage: Politics and Selecting Federal Judges Updated 2006
The Constitution Project’s Courts Initiative launched a comprehensive bipartisan project in 1999 to examine the efficacy of the federal judicial nomination and confirmation process. This report provides an update of the data and analysis collected then, with statistics from President George W. Bush’s first term and the 108th Congress. The statistics remain discouraging and much reform is still needed to reverse the trend of increasing delay in appointing judges to our federal courts.
Time For a Better System
Independent Courts Toolbox
The Constitution Project created the Independent Courts Toolbox™ for activist organizations and individuals working locally to defend the independence of the judiciary. This multifaceted “toolbox” is designed to empower those who would like to work on behalf of independent courts but lack the information and materials, and the time and resources, to develop them.
Donate Now

US Constitution

Upcoming Events